>>2229>What are we thinking?
It's capcom so nothing
remember when ubisoft made tactical shooters?
remember when Tom Clancy was a living person?
remember when new games were exciting?
be sads wif me :'(
I always thought most ubisoft games were ok to passable in terms of shooters
Ready or not is vapourware bordering on a marketing scam. All the 'gameplay' trailers are just heavily scripted AI stuff or pre-pre-alpha footage of shooting guns at walls and the influencer-only open beta thing they had was a disaster.
>Like vid related, it's the modern Rainbow Six successor everyone was asking for.
Ground Branch would be my pick for a modern Rainbow Six and even then it's not really finished enough to be worth paying for.
Damn, I wasn't following the game closely, that's lame. It has a real publisher though which puts it above 99% of early access scam games. Team17 have delivered on a lot of good games so I trust them to release the game in a good state.
Is there anything unique about it at all? R6 PVE edition?
I haven't played it and I'm bored of it already