[ h / librejp / sp / v ] [ ukko ]

/sp/ - Sparts

its a tampa kinda day
Name
Email
Subject
Comment
File
:
Embed
Password (For file deletion.)

File: 1719102270623-0.jpg (150.58 KB, 952x1190, 4:5, dig tags.jpg)

File: 1719102270623-1.png (455.06 KB, 2597x658, 371:94, ClipboardImage.png)

 No.1629899[View All]

here, queer, spend your money
how you peppering that angussy?
125 posts and 27 image replies omitted. Click reply to view.

 No.1635334

Check’d

 No.1635337

File: 1721090218443.png (12.37 KB, 500x250, 2:1, Oekaki.png)

GODDAMNIT

 No.1635340

File: 1721090261890.jpg (9.36 KB, 200x200, 1:1, 3426251241.jpg)

>>1635334 ­
­

 No.1640480

File: 1722842610052.jpg (165.52 KB, 885x961, 885:961, IMG_20240805_012010_147.jpg)


 No.1640509

>>1640480
explain this to me like im retarded

 No.1640535

>>1640509
it's a graphical representation of one of those fireworks that splits into multiple charges in midair

 No.1640539

>>1640535
what part of ukraine is this?

 No.1640562

>>1640509
wheat from chaff time

 No.1640576

>>1640539
no thats palestine

 No.1640652

>check muh stonks
>up on everything except gudyear which was a guess bet anyway
8bit wario lookin like a rart doin thumbs up.png

 No.1640657

>>1640652
i tried stonks a couple years ago then sold them off after only making 100 dollars and then like two months later most of the stonks i had started to go up. all i had to do was wait which is the one thing i'm usually rally gud at and i didn't do it

 No.1640659

File: 1722903628642.gif (43.32 KB, 560x582, 280:291, When the WA hits just righ….gif)

>>1640652
don't have that one but i have this

 No.1640669

File: 1722908066157.png (4.24 KB, 623x40, 623:40, ClipboardImage.png)

>>1640657
ahhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh
can this gay economic corpse just die already so i can dump in my 100k on the dip, bleeding red all over is never fun

 No.1640695

File: 1722922025560.png (325.4 KB, 1080x1080, 1:1, ClipboardImage.png)

>>1640659
that is nice ty
also i found it

 No.1640772

For some reason youtube has been reccomending me videos about the Warioland series and I was reminded of how great those games were.

Its a shame modern Nintendo became total soy bugman tier.

 No.1640777

File: 1722964966352.mp4 (31.09 MB, 1280x720, 16:9, Wario Hallway.mp4)

>>1640772
make sure to play warioland 4 for game boy advance
incredible, incredible

 No.1640791

>>1640777
I have already, one of my favs.
That games OST probably got me into all the weird experimental crap I listen too today.

 No.1641034

File: 1723033391144.jpg (88.71 KB, 676x463, 676:463, IMG_20240807_082145_271.jpg)

Repo — American Hegemony

If dollar funding (dollar demand) is America's claim to hegemony and infinite fiscal space (the Treasury's monopoly on unlimited debt issuance), then the repo market is perhaps the most essential piece to the hegemonic puzzle.

Lack of demand for Treasuries implies a lack of demand for dollar funding, and is often cited as the catalyst for America's "eventual" collapse. After all, who is going to buy billions in debt maturing in 2034 or later, issued by a nation on a clearly unsustainable fiscal path, right? It makes little to no practical sense… that is, until you understand how the dollar system works.

In the modern financial system, a Treasury is money. Treasuries = dollars.

Repo markets in general serve as a nexus between financial actors with different funding needs and objectives, such as money market funds or shadow banks with cash to lend and hedge funds with borrowing needs to meet, intermediated by banks (broker-dealers). These interactions take place in particular venues of the repo market, and each venue has a distinct interest rate ("repo rate").

A risky, dubious, yet elaborate arbitrage trade known for blowing up during turmoil provides a vital mechanism for engineering dollar demand, and creates a bulwark for American hegemony that not even de-deollarization of global trade can detach from.

The reality is that — as I warned months ago — dollar hegemony is largely out of the hands of governments and politics, but within the short term motives of what I called "agnostic" (politically and culturally indifferent with a profit-focused priority) financial actors, such as repo dealers, megabanks, and hedge funds.

Other countries will repo their sovereign bonds. In Japan, for example, a small market for "gensaki transactions" (Japanese Government Bond JGB repo) exists. However, none are nearly as liquid as UST repo, as both domestic and foreign holdings of USTs vastly outnumber those of other sovereign bonds.

JGB (or other sovereign bond) futures are generally less liquid or don't exist, eliminating the potential for liquidity to come from basis trades (which we will look at in depth). As you'll see, liquidity matters.

The reality may bite, but if you're going to argue in good faith about the future of the dollar, you must first understand how embedded it is within the global financial system and — importantly — why it continues to be.

This post will review Treasury repo and its various venues, note how repo market leverage creates more Treasury demand via cash-futures basis trades, and suggest how the basis trade could unravel.

 No.1641035

File: 1723033518690-0.jpg (68.18 KB, 1180x679, 1180:679, IMG_20240807_082317_713.jpg)

File: 1723033518690-1.jpg (61.1 KB, 853x1280, 853:1280, IMG_20240807_082317_464.jpg)

>>1641034
Treasury Repo

We've covered what Treasury repo is and how it works, both in text and in a video series ( https://t.me/DissidentThoughts/3456?single and https://t.me/DTPrimers/110?single ), but it's such a crucial piece to the modern financial system that it can't be reiterated enough. Fortunately, it's rather simple.

A repo (short for repurchase) transaction involves the sale of assets (collateral) with an agreement to buy them back (repurchase) on a specified future date (usually the next day) and at a prearranged price. By selling your collateral and agreeing to repurchase it, you are just borrowing cash. There's no need to make it any more confusing than that. The pawn shop analogy is accurate:

For example, at a pawn shop you may "sell" $1000 worth of gold (ex: a gold ring), and accept $950. The reason the pawn shop "dealer" would be willing to lend only $950 for $1000 in collateral is because he knows that gold has been quite volatile lately, and if gold's price were to fall 5% (the collateral value falls to $950) or more, he may lose money on the transaction. The 5% "premium" is called a haircut, and is a layer of insurance.

At the end of the transaction, which in repo is usually the next day, you would purchase the gold back from the dealer for $950 (plus any interest). You could also choose to extend the loan ("roll over the repo").

But in reality, you're not selling the gold item per se, because you're agreeing to repurchase the item back from the dealer at the pawn shop. If you fail to do so, the dealer keeps the collateral — hence it is "secured lending."

While "gold repo" is in theory totally possible, it serves better only as an example. Treasury repo, where Treasury bills/notes/bonds are the collateral, is a daily operation of several trillion dollars, with unreported venues comprising another estimated ~$2 trillion in daily volumes.

The exhibit above is a very basic model of the dollar flows in repo. The collateral (Treasury securities) flow in the opposite direction of cash, obviously. And while there are four major repo venues (Tri-Party repo, GCF & DVP interdealer repo, and uncleared bilateral repo), the only differences are a third-party custodian holding the collateral (in tri-party repo) and whether the transaction is cleared by the FICC (in interdealer repo).

But at the end of the day, a repo is mechanically identical across all venues.

 No.1641036

File: 1723033557070.jpg (21.01 KB, 641x327, 641:327, IMG_20240807_082531_500.jpg)

>>1641035
Repo Financing

The repo market allows for relative value (RV) hedge funds engaged in the cash-futures basis trade to acquire significant leverage, thus generating correspondingly significant demand for cash Treasuries. This is called repo financing, or repo leverage.

For example, a hedge fund who wants to buy $100 in Treasuries can put down $1 of its own money and end up borrowing the remaining $99 in a repo transaction. Here is how that would work:

Step 1: A hedge fund agrees to buy $100 in Treasuries from a bank as part of a basis trade.

Step 2: At the same time, the hedge fund agrees to repo that $100 in Treasuries at a 1% haircut. This means the hedge fund will receive $99 in cash and agree to repurchase the Treasuries for $99.03 tomorrow (the $0.03 is the interest for the overnight loan, the repo rate). Note that the repo trade is a different counterparty than the original seller of the Treasury.

Normally, the hedge fund cannot sell the Treasuries for the full $100 because the dealer will ask for a small haircut to protect itself from any changes in the collateral value.

In the example we're using, the dealer sees Treasury collateral as very stable and is only looking for a 1% haircut (1% of $100, or $1). Note that in some bilateral repo markets, haircuts on Treasuries are nearly 0%, allowing for significant leverage (and risks).

The SEC’s proposal for mandatory repo clearing may reduce Treasury market liquidity by raising the cost of repo financing (haircuts in cleared repo are 2%), making the basis trade increasingly unprofitable.

Step 3: The hedge fund takes the $99 it received in the repo transaction, plus only $1 of its own money, and pays the bank $100 for the cash Treasury. The hedge fund is thus able to buy $100 of Treasuries with just $1 of its own money.

Note that up to this point, these steps should be thought of as occurring simultaneously.

Step 4: The next day the hedge fund is obligated to repurchase the $100 in Treasuries for $99.03, where $0.03 is the interest charged on the overnight loan. The hedge fund can either renew the repo loan or get out of the trade by selling the Treasury to the market for $100 and paying the dealer $99.03 with the proceeds.

With repo leverage, nominal demand for cash Treasuries is magnified.

 No.1641037

File: 1723033610364-0.jpg (242.39 KB, 1280x1059, 1280:1059, IMG_20240807_082608_180.jpg)

File: 1723033610364-1.jpg (94.88 KB, 962x1280, 481:640, IMG_20240807_082608_790.jpg)

File: 1723033610364-2.jpg (39.76 KB, 729x653, 729:653, IMG_20240807_082608_849.jpg)

>>1641036
The Cash-Futures Basis Trade

In early 2018, a string of events formed an exploit in America’s sovereign debt market. Following a surge in Treasury issuance and regulatory reforms, asset managers (pension funds, mutual funds, and insurance companies) began to shift out of cash bonds and into long positions of their associated Treasury futures contracts.

A Treasury futures contract is a standardized agreement to buy Treasury securities at a predetermined price on a specified future date. Unlike option derivatives, which provide a right but do not obligate, futures contracts involve a binding obligation to transact on or before the contract matures.

The reason the basis (the difference between the cash Treasury price and the Treasury futures price) exists is because said asset managers began piling into Treasury futures, thus raising the futures' price relative to cash Treasuries. They prefer the futures over cash Treasuries because futures are operationally simpler and have less impact on their expense ratios. Most asset managers are not set up for repo, for example.

The cash-futures basis trade, or simply "the basis trade", is a three-legged arbitrage trade that seeks to exploit the basis, spanning three crucial financial markets: the cash Treasury market, where investors purchase Treasuries today; the Treasury futures market, where investors agree on a fixed price to pay for Treasuries they will receive in the future; and the Treasury repo market, where investors leverage their cash Treasury purchases.

Basis trades buy cash Treasuries and short Treasury futures to construct a payoff that depends on the two prices converging as the delivery date approaches (see Figure 2 in the third image).

This is similar to a long/short equity strategy, and convergence is virtually guaranteed: at the delivery date, cash and futures prices must be equal because otherwise on that date a trader could just buy a Treasury in the cash market and immediately deliver it into the futures market for an instant profit.

Shorting a Treasury futures contract means entering into an agreement to sell the underlying Treasury at a future date and at a predetermined price. It is an obligation.

To "deliver on a futures contract" means to fulfill that obligation by transferring the underlying Treasury to the buyer on the expiration date.

The key is that, so long as futures prices keep rising markedly above the price of their underlying Treasury securities, traders would buy bonds at a discount to what they’d receive when delivering these securities into futures contracts. If the basis were to narrow (or, potentially, invert), the trade would no longer be profitable, and this marginal buyer for Treasuries would vanish.

Only certain futures contracts and Treasury securities are used in basis trading. On any given date, there is just one Treasury security that basis traders want to own for each contract to make a particular deal as profitable as possible, called the “cheapest-to-deliver” Treasury.

The CTD ("cheapest-to-deliver") is simply the Treasury security with the cheapest value that is eligible to be delivered onto a futures contract.

Otherwise-similar Treasuries will differ in whether they are deliverable into a futures contract. A conversion factor attached to the futures price is meant to account for the desirability of individual Treasuries (the CME provides updates on conversion factors).

Due to these conversion factors, only one Treasury will be cheapest-to-deliver into each futures contract. But which that is can change over the life of a contract.

 No.1641038

File: 1723033647938-0.jpg (84.14 KB, 631x1280, 631:1280, IMG_20240807_082702_658.jpg)

File: 1723033647938-1.jpg (113.45 KB, 1117x683, 1117:683, IMG_20240807_082702_420.jpg)

File: 1723033647938-2.jpg (69.56 KB, 1280x684, 320:171, IMG_20240807_082702_564.jpg)

>>1641037
Implementing Basis Trades

Understanding sources of risk for basis trades and where stress can manifest requires understanding the technical details of how these trades are implemented.

The basis — or the profitability of a cash-futures basis trade — is characterized by the implied repo rate (IRR), which reflects the cost of carrying the security (including financing costs) until the futures contract's expiration.

When the implied repo rate is greater than the actual repo rate, basis traders borrowing in the repo market can profit by buying the cash Treasury and shorting the corresponding futures. At delivery, the trader will earn the spread between the IRR and the repo rate. When the actual repo rate is greater than the implied rate, a "long basis" trade is not profitable.

The IRR is closely related to the yield on a Treasury bill because the cash flows from the basis trade replicate those from a Treasury bill maturing on the futures delivery date.

In particular, in times of relative illiquidity and high balance sheet costs, the implied repo rate has deviated significantly from the rate of return on bills.

One example of these deviations occurred following the collapse of Lehman Brothers in 2008 (see Figure 4 above). Immediately after that collapse, as liquidity dried up in financial markets, implied repo rates collapsed deeply negative across contracts. The IRR decline reflected a flight to safety in Treasury markets.

Because the futures price and the cash price of the Treasury are known to the basis trader, provided he also knows the repo rate, profits on these bets at delivery are guaranteed.

The basis trade does not, however, offer risk-free profits. Several risks threaten the profitability of the basis trade, and thus create potential consequences for financial stability.

 No.1641039

File: 1723033737994-0.jpg (56.5 KB, 1068x595, 1068:595, IMG_20240807_082740_577.jpg)

File: 1723033737994-1.jpg (106.57 KB, 1162x611, 1162:611, IMG_20240807_082739_644.jpg)

File: 1723033737994-2.jpg (104.9 KB, 1233x753, 411:251, IMG_20240807_082739_751.jpg)

File: 1723033737994-3.jpg (288.84 KB, 1074x1280, 537:640, IMG_20240807_082739_986.jpg)

>>1641038
The Greatest Credit Event of All

In just the last few weeks, we've seen two major trades — the Yen carry trade and the short volatility trade — "blow up", even though neither lasted nor took the street down with it. What about the basis trade?

We alluded at the start of the year that the "mother of all credit events" would be a disorderly rise in bond yields leading to dollar debasement. This is the "de-dollarization" that keeps Treasury and Federal Reserve officials up at night — not means of trade being re-routed off the dollar and onto other forms of settlement.

A credit event occurs when a borrower can no longer meet debt obligations, leading to a default, bankruptcy, or restructuring. For example, an insolvent bank being unable to pay depositors in a bank run.
There are two legs to the basis trade: the asset managers who express Treasury exposure via buying futures, and the hedge funds who repo finance cash Treasury purchases. While hedge funds are the marginal buyers of cash Treasuries, it's the asset managers who buy Treasury futures that ultimately hold the risk.

The marginal absorber of cash Treasuries remains the basis trade, but it can run into limits either from a regulatory crack down on hedge funds or limitations on dealer repo financing. New research from TBAC suggests that changes in the credit environment could also threaten the trade.

What asset managers do is effectively take the opposite side of the basis trade by selling cash Treasuries outright and using the proceeds to finance their credit investments. They then add back the Treasury exposure through futures.

That positioning also more directly links the Treasury & credit markets together, as potential losses on credit may lead to deleveraging in Treasury positions as managers de-gross.

It could also lead to liquidity squeezes as managers sell Treasuries to meet redemptions, as credit markets may not be liquid to enough to raise cash. Outside of a systemic or apparent credit event, note that credit spreads have spiked this month.

In the wake of such a risk-off credit event (think: a bank failure), monetary authorities are limited to only a few modes of easing. But the rise of foreign, non-official, unhedged accounts as the marginal buyer for Treasuries means that they are particularly vulnerable to dollar devaluation that results from a policy of easing.

Aggressive rate cuts in the name of providing economic support for example may therefore paradoxically be ill advised insofar as it weakens the dollar against other currencies (like the euro), because said non-official accounts would likely firesale their Treasury holdings as they try to avoid realizing losses, spiking repo financing costs and repo rates as dealer warehousing capacity is pushed to the edge.

That was the case in March 2020, when risk-off paradoxically led to a spike in yields, as Treasury holders aggressively sold their securities for cash. Although this time, it may be to preserve foreign capital against unhedged Treasury losses.

(Disclaimer: this is a theoretical but plausible example).

heres da thread and it has a lot more links than the two i posted in the first of these posts https://t.me/DissidentThoughts/3811

 No.1641065

>>1641039
>The Greatest Credit Event of All
lel i remember i did a schizopost about this same shit lik 6yrs ago and zerohedge just copypastad it from /biz/. they took out all the imageboardisms tho. way to ruin the fun

 No.1641066

but yah the next big credit crunch will be absolutely fucking catastrophic on a lvl >weve never seen before

 No.1641092

>>1641039
gud effortpost
moneys so incredibly fake and gay, basically lizard people being real. boggles the mind

 No.1646729

how can i make beans and rice not taste like drywall

 No.1646730

>>1646729
salt n peppa

 No.1646732

>>1646729
brown ppl been doing this forever just ask them

 No.1646844

>>1646729
rice cooker is the worlds greatest invention to not involve pornography
add some cumin, salsa, hot sauce, get jiggy with it
meat and cheese are so easy they're practically cheating
experiment with how you cook the beans
oven baked beans are underrated
if you still can't manage it cut the beans and just figure out how to make rice delicious first (never eat rice on its own)
white rice in particular is bland but a great enhancer to a bunch of other foods, there's a reason it's usually eaten as a bed or wrap for other foods

 No.1646911

>>1646844
adding all those things kinda defeats the financial point of eating beans and rice though.

 No.1646914

>>1646911
>can't afford seasoning or hot sauce
holy shit stop wasting all your money on vwhores and figurines you manchild

 No.1646920

>>1646911
are you planning to use sonmuch seasoning to the point a 5 dollar bottle of something doesn't last you months? i'm generous af with shit like garlic powder and cayenne pepper and a little container of each will still last me like 3 months
rice cookers are also cheap and a one time purchase, sometimes in order to save you've gotta spend at first. or you can just stick with your bland af beans and rice i guess idk

 No.1646921

rice cookers are fucking goated
cooking rice on a stove top makes me want to commit violent murders

i picked one up for 80 dollars at costco, its a tiger model and its pretty good, 6 months of use and no complaints
just got to be careful with the teflon inside, or else you will get sissy hypno chemicals in all your rice

 No.1646924

>>1646911
budy spices are cheap as fucking shit wat are you even talking about go talk to the crikmonkrs they hook it up phat

 No.1646925

>>1646921
>>1646844
how are you guys fucking up stove rice?
they rally that big of an upgrade if ur rice game is gud?
>>1646729
hot sauce, or just buy whatev veg is on special. greens r gud in it, can eat dandelion greens if ur super poor budy but then u should just do a garden

 No.1646927

>>1646921
>cooking rice on a stove top makes me want to commit violent murders
its not that bad
just give it a lil more water than usual
i usually throw some butter or oil in it too so then even if im totally retarded and forget i was cookin it doesnt get all fucked to the bottom of the pot

 No.1646930

>>1646925
they're so legit they need an mc hammer endorsement
the rice is perfect every time, they can do all kinds of rice, and cooking is so goddamn easy
>add water
>add rice
>push button
>wait for beep
but that's not even the best part
if you get one of the fancy jap models that lock and seal they can keep your rice fresh cooked for like 24 hours after it finishes

 No.1646933

>>1646930
my rice is nice already add 2 cardamom pod and 2 anise to 1C rice but
>fresh cooked for like 24 hours
may have sold me. hows jap material these days?
leaving sketch MTR teflon on heat sounds iffy

 No.1646943

>>1646925
if your stove sucks it's easy to accidentally turn the whole pot into one giant sticky ball of bullshit. just gotta watch it more closely in that case but you could also just get a rice cooker i guess

 No.1646944

i already have a pressure cooker that i got for free cuz my sister bought one for my mom for Christmas but Macy's fucked up and delivered two at no extra charge so i got the other one. rly nice for cooking beans, can have dried beans ready to eat in under an hour without soaking, shit's great.
also have a meat grinder and pasta cutter that i have yet to use, could i just buy cheap cuts that they're about to trash anyways and grind em up?

 No.1646945

>>1646925
problem is it boils over really fuckn easily if you add too much water then you got rise residue all over your pot and stove that you have to clean up, too little water and it all becomes a burnt mess by the end
even when ur doing it in an instant pot when you open the pressure release all the rice residue sprays out like a volcano

 No.1646953

>>1646925
its not about fucking it up, its that to get it consistent you really need to be on it the whole time

its also highly dependent on your stove top type, i mean god forbid you are a electric top user trying to make rice

with a rice cooker, its just wash the rice, add some water, add your chosen spices, DONE and clean up is so fucking easy

 No.1646956

>>1646943
>>1646945
>>1646953
sounds lik you guys are converted but 3:2 w:r, cover, bring to boil, shake or stir, low for 20-25 mins. less work than ramen
they sound nice tho, just have bunch of appliances already ig not poo pooing em

 No.1646959

>>1646953
>i mean god forbid you are a electric top user trying to make rice
electric stoves are unbelievably gay and shitty, but that shouldnt be an issue either, frankly
are you lik adding the rice before the waters boiling or some retard shit?

just wait till it boils, add rice, stir it a bit, throw in sum oil/butter, and cover it and drop the heat

 No.1646960

>>1646956
>just have bunch of appliances
single-purpose appliances are memes for bored housewives who already have enough dildos
imo at least

 No.1646964

>>1646956
if my stove wasn't shit i'd just use that, but it works well enough for most other stuff and i'd rather just buy a rice cooker for less than $100 than spend minimum $500 on a lower end new stove

 No.1646972

>>1646959
muh rice goes into cold water, comes out fluffy as a geisha's bush
i do lower temp for longer on the actual cooking but basically gordong vers

 No.1646982

File: 1725490687560.png (103.87 KB, 480x480, 1:1, 1646602269.646377-.png)

>>1646960
>already have enough dildos
like shoes, women can never have too many dildos

 No.1647048

File: 1725515936058.png (122.18 KB, 500x268, 125:67, 165346642384.png)

I didn't feel like playing guessing games with the wordfilter so enjoy some FAT TEXT
>>1646933
I have no idea what the teflon guy was on about, Maybe it’s a different kinda rice cooker

i had a cheap one which was just a pot, a lid, and an on button that switched off when it was done, but then i tried the fancy ones that seal up, and those Are the ones that do the fancy shit I was talking about. Those are like computers minus all the soyboy IOT faggotry So idk how you could ever fuck it up if you’re just doing rice/butter/water But I don’t add butter so YMMV I guess? If you’re worried about quality as long as your rice cooker comes from a civilized country (NOT CHINKSHIT)you shouldn’t have to worry。 Japs, koreans, etc. can’t afford proper doors or beds but everyone has a rice cooker
while you’re at it look up prewashed rice. it’s the new sliced bread
>>1646960
Not wrong but unless you’re keto or something every meal involves rice or bread (unless its noodles), so any single use appliance that solves the bread and/or rice problem is worth it



[Return][Go to top] [Catalog] [Post a Reply]
Delete Post [ ]
[ h / librejp / sp / v ] [ ukko ]